Boulder Colorado Shooting

Yesterday, A Gun Jumped Off A Shelf & Shot Someone. The Gun Has Been Arrested.

Boulder Colorado is the latest place to experience a “mass shooting”. This writer is going to make some predictions without having any knowledge of the details. Shooter was an angry Jihadist who hated Trump HERE.

Here We Go – FBI Knew Boulder, Colorado, Suspect Identity Prior to Shooting

March 23, 2021 | Sundance | 585 CommentsStop me when you have heard this before.  The Boulder, Colorado, shooter was named as 21-year-old Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa earlier today.  An then this gem from the New York Times:(New York Times) “The suspect’s identity was known to the F.B.I. because he was linked to another individual under investigation by the bureau, according to law enforcement officials.” (link)

A reminder…. 50 FBI agents were enlisted within the Trump-Russia investigation to push a narrative. 13 FBI agents were dispatched to Talladega speedway to investigate a garage pull-down rope and push a narrative.  Thousands of FBI hours have been spent investigating the January 6th Washington DC protest… and once again another terrorist carries out a mass shooting where the FBI knew the suspect in advance.The FBI knew in advance the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff.  The FBI knew in advance the San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by Russians.  The FBI knew in advance the Garland, Texas, shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi).  The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz). The FBI knew in advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan); and now the FBI knew in advance of Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.Those are just off-the-top of my head…  Anyone notice a pattern?Meanwhile the political FBI agents chase the ghosts of mysteriously invisible white supremacists conducting random acts of unidentified racism.

1.) The shooter will be identified as a “lone gunman”.

2.) The shooter will have been on some kind of psychotropic drug treatment. (if so, the media will suppress this knowledge)

3.) The shooter will have obtained his guns legally.

4.) The shooter will recently have been in touch (somehow/someway) with either the F.B.I. or the C.I.A.

5.) Colorado’s leftist governor and legislature along with the usual crowd will scream for draconian regulations of guns, or worse yet, total confiscation.

It is worth noting that a lady by the name of “Moonshadow” (remember, this is Boulder) said, “There was nothing I could do!” That of course is totally untrue. She could have been armed and maybe saved some lives.

Let’s see how this writer scores.

Shooter I.D.’d HERE. Likely a Jihadist – hey liberals love those guys!

HERE IS AN IMMEDIATE RESPONSE:

The People’s Republic of Boulder. Airhead Heaven the wailing & moaning will commence NOW.
The one right in the Bill of Rights that says “shall not be infringed” is the one RIGHT Xiden is going after. It is important to took at what words meant at the time the Constitution and Amendments were written. For example it was understood that militia meant volunteers, not a standing army. Today people try to present that, for example, the National Guard, is the well regulated militia. It isn’t. Similarly,the word “infringe” was a relatively new word to the English language. Its original meaning is much stronger than what people think of it as being today. [infringe (v.) mid-15c., enfrangen, “to violate,” from Latin infringere “to damage, break off, break, bruise,” from in- “in” (from PIE root *en “in”) + frangere “to break” (from PIE root *bhreg- “to break”). Meaning “encroach” first recorded c. 1760. Related: Infringed; infringing.]
Find one government in all of history that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
Oppressive Governments ALWAYS ban the People’S RIGHT to arms.
The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS
The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.

If I can VOTE without ID because “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution: the right to vote”
Then I can BUY A GUN without ID because THAT is “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution” TOO!
If I can vote by MAIL I can buy and sell GUNS by MAIL.
If POLL TAXES and LITERACY TESTS are INFRINGEments on the right to vote then every “gun control” proposal is an INFRINGEment on the RIGHTS codified in the 2nd Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment, the ONLY Amendment that states “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.
the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.

… the Bolshevik-Left insists there is NO GOD so they can deny all your GOD given RIGHTS.

Your Rights do not come from the Constitution. Your Rights come from Our Creator, and the Constitution was written to SUPERVISE, REGULATE, and CONTROL government actors. As it relates to firearms, the Heller “decision” was completely unnecessary, and likely a smokescreen to make it APPEAR that the USG retained some rights to regulate some firearms. Check out the relevant part of US v. Cruikshank:
“[The Right to Keep and Bear Arms] is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed;… This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,…”.

SCROLL DOWN

Many Links Below – Become Informed!

Feel Free To Pass On Any Posts

Pen

Pensamiento Peligroso writes the truth as he sees it, and if it upsets you, then it makes you think!

www.touchstoneconnect.com Subscribe for free – no ads!

THERE ARE  25 LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE ON THE RIGHT SIDE – OTHER REPUTABLE SITES FOR YOUR EDIFICATION INCLUDING G. Edward Griffin, John Stossel, Walter Williams, Zero Hedge to name a few.

12 comments

  1. Alberticus · · Reply

    The People’s Republic of Boulder. Airhead Heaven the wailing & moaning will commence NOW.
    The one right in the Bill of Rights that says “shall not be infringed” is the one RIGHT Xiden is going after. It is important to took at what words meant at the time the Constitution and Amendments were written. For example it was understood that militia meant volunteers, not a standing army. Today people try to present that, for example, the National Guard, is the well regulated militia. It isn’t. Similarly,the word “infringe” was a relatively new word to the English language. Its original meaning is much stronger than what people think of it as being today. [infringe (v.) mid-15c., enfrangen, “to violate,” from Latin infringere “to damage, break off, break, bruise,” from in- “in” (from PIE root *en “in”) + frangere “to break” (from PIE root *bhreg- “to break”). Meaning “encroach” first recorded c. 1760. Related: Infringed; infringing.]
    Find one government in all of history that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
    Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments ALWAYS ban the People’S RIGHT to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.

    If I can VOTE without ID because “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution: the right to vote”
    Then I can BUY A GUN without ID because THAT is “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution” TOO!
    If I can vote by MAIL I can buy and sell GUNS by MAIL.
    If POLL TAXES and LITERACY TESTS are INFRINGEments on the right to vote then every “gun control” proposal is an INFRINGEment on the RIGHTS codified in the 2nd Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment, the ONLY Amendment that states “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.
    the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.

    … the Bolshevik-Left insists there is NO GOD so they can deny all your GOD given RIGHTS.

    Your Rights do not come from the Constitution. Your Rights come from Our Creator, and the Constitution was written to SUPERVISE, REGULATE, and CONTROL government actors. As it relates to firearms, the Heller “decision” was completely unnecessary, and likely a smokescreen to make it APPEAR that the USG retained some rights to regulate some firearms. Check out the relevant part of US v. Cruikshank:
    “[The Right to Keep and Bear Arms] is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed;… This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,…”.

    Like

    1. Without attribution, I have posted your response. BOULDER COLORADO SHOOTING

      Like

  2. Here we go again! Another “mass shooting” in the USA. Based on previous mass shootings and the subsequent narratives that follow, these issues will NOT be covered in investigating this shooting-
    1) does shooter take some type of prescription med?
    2) did shooter have any criminal record?
    3) was there another shooter?
    4) did shooter have any contact with the FBI or other law enforcement?
    5) political leanings(if they are towards the Democrats)
    6) other background info that throws the official version into question.

    Things that will be implied by the media-
    1) shooter was a racist
    2) shooter liked Trump
    3) shooter was unknown to authorities.
    4) statements or actions the media can use to brand this shooter in some way.

    Like

    1. XLNT! Analysis right on!

      Like

  3. Very recently there was some form of socio-political @$$holery involving college students in/around Boulder, CO. Did the triggerman have any connections to those people, or was he independently inspired? Did he read a lot of conflicting, confusing, angry reactionary intercrap? Many questions, they got him alive apparently so maybe he’ll be able to answer some after he come down and calms down. Lots of people running around today with their hair on fire and lost their mental bearings apparently. Word to the wise…calm yo ship.

    Like

    1. He’ll probably hang himself in prison. Maybe he’ll get a 20 year sentence with time off for good behavior/Jihadism. The leftist scum don’t like God’s way which is that if a man sheds a man’s blood, so shall his blood be shed. That’s too archaic and mean spirited. Of course mass murder is o.k., because it is grist for the mill as far as the gun grabbing leftist scum is concerned.

      Like

  4. NobodySAIDboo boo · · Reply

    the pos walked away unharmed!!!!
    kill him like in the TEXAS church shooting and his boss.

    Like

    1. He did receive a wound in his leg. Yes, I was in Garland Texas the day a shooter was dispatched without incident by the citizenry.

      Like

  5. Buy guns and ammo with stimulus while you still can. Give these thieving usurpers ZERO in taxes. You are at WAR act accordingly

    Like

    1. The war started in earnest in 1913, and has escalated since. The beginning of WW I was in the Garden of Eden, and has continues since.

      Like

  6. You for got one… The gunman will be a REPUBLICAN, and likely a “proud boy” “trump supporter” who does not believe in covid or the “vaccine”.

    Like

    1. That’s a given.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: