Boulder Colorado is the latest place to experience a “mass shooting”. This writer is going to make some predictions without having any knowledge of the details. Shooter was an angry Jihadist who hated Trump HERE.
Here We Go – FBI Knew Boulder, Colorado, Suspect Identity Prior to Shooting
March 23, 2021 | Sundance | 585 CommentsStop me when you have heard this before. The Boulder, Colorado, shooter was named as 21-year-old Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa earlier today. An then this gem from the New York Times:(New York Times) “The suspect’s identity was known to the F.B.I. because he was linked to another individual under investigation by the bureau, according to law enforcement officials.” (link)
A reminder…. 50 FBI agents were enlisted within the Trump-Russia investigation to push a narrative. 13 FBI agents were dispatched to Talladega speedway to investigate a garage pull-down rope and push a narrative. Thousands of FBI hours have been spent investigating the January 6th Washington DC protest… and once again another terrorist carries out a mass shooting where the FBI knew the suspect in advance.The FBI knew in advance the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff. The FBI knew in advance the San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by Russians. The FBI knew in advance the Garland, Texas, shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi). The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz). The FBI knew in advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan); and now the FBI knew in advance of Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.Those are just off-the-top of my head… Anyone notice a pattern?Meanwhile the political FBI agents chase the ghosts of mysteriously invisible white supremacists conducting random acts of unidentified racism.
1.) The shooter will be identified as a “lone gunman”.
2.) The shooter will have been on some kind of psychotropic drug treatment. (if so, the media will suppress this knowledge)
3.) The shooter will have obtained his guns legally.
4.) The shooter will recently have been in touch (somehow/someway) with either the F.B.I. or the C.I.A.
5.) Colorado’s leftist governor and legislature along with the usual crowd will scream for draconian regulations of guns, or worse yet, total confiscation.
It is worth noting that a lady by the name of “Moonshadow” (remember, this is Boulder) said, “There was nothing I could do!” That of course is totally untrue. She could have been armed and maybe saved some lives.
Let’s see how this writer scores.
Shooter I.D.’d HERE. Likely a Jihadist – hey liberals love those guys!
HERE IS AN IMMEDIATE RESPONSE:
The People’s Republic of Boulder. Airhead Heaven the wailing & moaning will commence NOW.
The one right in the Bill of Rights that says “shall not be infringed” is the one RIGHT Xiden is going after. It is important to took at what words meant at the time the Constitution and Amendments were written. For example it was understood that militia meant volunteers, not a standing army. Today people try to present that, for example, the National Guard, is the well regulated militia. It isn’t. Similarly,the word “infringe” was a relatively new word to the English language. Its original meaning is much stronger than what people think of it as being today. [infringe (v.) mid-15c., enfrangen, “to violate,” from Latin infringere “to damage, break off, break, bruise,” from in- “in” (from PIE root *en “in”) + frangere “to break” (from PIE root *bhreg- “to break”). Meaning “encroach” first recorded c. 1760. Related: Infringed; infringing.]
Find one government in all of history that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
Oppressive Governments ALWAYS ban the People’S RIGHT to arms.
The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS
The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
If I can VOTE without ID because “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution: the right to vote”
Then I can BUY A GUN without ID because THAT is “one the of most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution” TOO!
If I can vote by MAIL I can buy and sell GUNS by MAIL.
If POLL TAXES and LITERACY TESTS are INFRINGEments on the right to vote then every “gun control” proposal is an INFRINGEment on the RIGHTS codified in the 2nd Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment, the ONLY Amendment that states “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.
the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.
… the Bolshevik-Left insists there is NO GOD so they can deny all your GOD given RIGHTS.
Your Rights do not come from the Constitution. Your Rights come from Our Creator, and the Constitution was written to SUPERVISE, REGULATE, and CONTROL government actors. As it relates to firearms, the Heller “decision” was completely unnecessary, and likely a smokescreen to make it APPEAR that the USG retained some rights to regulate some firearms. Check out the relevant part of US v. Cruikshank:
“[The Right to Keep and Bear Arms] is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed;… This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,…”.
Many Links Below – Become Informed!
Feel Free To Pass On Any Posts
Pensamiento Peligroso writes the truth as he sees it, and if it upsets you, then it makes you think!
www.touchstoneconnect.com Subscribe for free – no ads!
THERE ARE 25 LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE ON THE RIGHT SIDE – OTHER REPUTABLE SITES FOR YOUR EDIFICATION INCLUDING G. Edward Griffin, John Stossel, Walter Williams, Zero Hedge to name a few.