2KT & Democracy!

Democracy (Vigilante Justice – Ox Bow Incident Movie) At Work!

We’ll get to what 2KT is in a moment. First, let’s examine “democracy”. Some have described it as two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner. Biblically, Adam and Eve voted 2 to 1 against God when they chose to eat of the “forbidden fruit”. The bottom line is that the concept of democracy is when 50% + 1 = a majority that decides for everyone. This concept is contrary to the Constitution which was based upon fixed moral laws (standards) which protected the minority from the majority. Failing to understand this feature (distinction) leads to the path of tyranny and destruction.

Founding Father James Madison

“on Democracies:

“there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”

― James Madison, Federalist Papers Nos. 10 and 51

America’s Constittuion provides us with a “Republic”! You will not find the word democracy anywhere in the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution.

More from Madison on Christianity and religion:

“We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no man’s right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society, and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance. True it is, that no other rule exists, by which any question which may divide a Society, can be ultimately determined, but the will of the majority; but it is also true, that the majority may trespass on the rights of the minority.

…Because it is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of Citizens, and one of the noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The free men of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much soon to forget it. Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?

…Because experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of Religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.

…What influence in fact have ecclesiastical establishments had on Civil Society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the Civil authority; in many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny: in no instance have they been seen the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty, may have found an established Clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just Government instituted to secure & perpetuate it needs them not. Such a Government will be best supported by protecting every Citizen in the enjoyment of his Religion with the same equal hand which protects his person and his property; by neither invading the equal rights of any Sect, nor suffering any Sect to invade those of another.

[Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, 20 June 1785. This was written in response to a proposed bill that would establish ‘teachers of the Christian religion’, violating the 1st Amendment’s establishment clause]”

― James Madison, A Memorial And Remonstrance, On The Religious Rights Of Man: Written In 1784-85

It is clear that a major founding father of America was opposed to establishing a national religion. At the same time, religion cannot be equated with God’s law which is written on the hearts of all men Romans 2:14 & 15. No society (civilization) can survive without law! Anarchists will prove that by their own hypocrisy. The Constitution provides a foundation for civil and moral laws, and mentions that we are “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights – life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Scripture refers to men who are happy when they are under God’s authority and blessing i.e. Proverbs 3:13, 16:20, 28:14 and Psalm 144:15. Therefore, “happiness” is a Biblical concept. The Constitution does not imply either material or spiritual happiness specifically as the endowment.

The Constitution signs off with “in the year of our Lord…”, which is based upon the birth of Jesus Christ. It is clear that although no established religion was to be put into place in America, God’s moral law applied!

Now, let’s examine briefly 2KT which is an abbreviation for Two Kingdom Theology. The fundamentals of 2KT are simple; there is the sacred (church) and the secular (state), and the two shall have nothing to do with each other. Put another way, the state shall not tell the church what to do, and the church shall not tell the state what to do. Fair enough as far as administrative and/or ideological and philosophical approaches. But what about morality? Is the state immune to the needs for a consistent and righteous morality to be implemented? Psalm 33:12 says a nation is blessed when God is their Lord. Proverbs 14:34 says “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.”

Sin is any violation of God’s moral law. Now, if a Christian people (and the church they make up), turn a blind eye to Proverbs 14:34 by taking on the 2KT and divorcing the church and the Gospel from the law, then what can we possibly expect?

This writer believes that the Christian community, with and through the church, has turned over our nation to wickedness. One prime example would be the fact that until 1966, homosexuality was illegal in all 50 states of the United States. In 1966, the state of Illinois decriminalized homosexuality. Had the church been on its toes, so to speak, that would never have happened. , and since then, it’s been down hill; from decriminalization to acceptance, to legalization, to church membership, to allowing for marriage of same sex partners, to holding office in churches, to Christians (among others) supporting homosexuality with their tax dollars, to adoption of children by homosexuals, to acceptance of pedophilia, to the mutilation of children’s genitalia (also taxpayer funded) for the purpose of transgenderism. What’s next?

It must be understood, that homosexuals are at war with God, and they will never relent nor compromise with God or His followers (the church). Either the church will fully accept homosexuality and embrace it whole heartedly, or it will embrace God’s moral law order whole heartedly. There is no middle ground! Remember that homosexuality is virtually the only sin referred to in Scripture as an “abomination”, or put another way, a paritcularly egregious sin.

Therefore, it is, in the opinion of this writer, that 2KT is an egregious error of doctrine contrary to Biblical teaching, and if the church wants to survive in any meaningful way, they must reject that philosophy and restore God’s moral law order! Back to democracy – what’s for dinner? Wolves or Christians?

Pensiamento Peligroso

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.