Mandates

Mandator In Chief

Under America’s legal system, a mandate may be official, but it is not law. Laws are legislated, meaning they are voted upon by elected officials and signed into law by an executive such as a Mayor, Governor or President. Mandates are commands to be obeyed in the eyes of the mandator, and failure to do so may be exasperating to the mandator, but it is not a violation of the law to fail to comply. Non-compliance with a mandate is a good way to thumb your nose at a tyrannical mandator. For all intents and purposes, a mandator is equivalent to a dictator, and America is not, although getting close, a dictatorship. Let us hope and pray that it does not become so.

SCROLL WAY DOWN

Many Links Below – Become Informed!

Feel Free To Pass On Any Posts

Pen

Pensamiento Peligroso writes the truth as he sees it, and if it upsets you, then it makes you think!

www.touchstoneconnect.com Subscribe for free – no ads!

THERE ARE  25 LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE ON THE RIGHT SIDE – OTHER REPUTABLE SITES FOR YOUR EDIFICATION INCLUDING G. Edward Griffin, John Stossel, Walter Williams, Zero Hedge to name a few.

4 comments

  1. NobodySAIDboo · · Reply

    dont be a KENT STATE type victim, do not comply and always shoot back.

    Like

    1. This writer sent out an email in January 2020 saying non-compliance was the order of the day. It was ignored. Nobody was able to see what was coming.

      Like

  2. “The law cannot be used to Mandate Actions to take, otherwise ones a criminal. The law can only be used to define punishments for Actions Already Taken. If it forces Actions, it is Not the Law.”

    Frederic Bastiat – “The Law” 76 pages of simple understanding spelled out plainly.

    Like

    1. I would dispute that assessment. We have legislated laws that require traffic signals, speed limits, safety requirements (OSHA), and other regulatory procedures, and once legislated, compliance is expected, or the punishment will take place. Generally there is a period of time to become compliant in order to avoid an ex post facto type situation. It is a method that the bureaucracy has implemented to avoid the separation of powers by giving a bureaucracy the power to initiate law. That’s why the CDC has overstepped their bounds by huge margins – regulating landlord tenant relationships for example, and the Supreme Court ruled that they were out of line on that.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: