Mysongyny defined HERE, is a word tossed around derrogatorily as well as improperly for a destructive and evil purpose! Historically, as a part of America’s history, the church and Christianity has played a very significant part.

As an example, in the founding of this country, not only did you have to be a property owner to vote for a political office, but you also had to be a man. Why? Men, according to the Bible, which is considered highly mysogynistic, calls for men to lead society. Women were to compliment men by leading the children in their daily lives in the form of nurture, adademics, self disicpline, personal hygeine home administration etc. while the man went to work, war or public/private/religious service. The man was the head of the household and as such was the ultimate decision maker on all things. The woman provided input which might influence the husband, but she submitted to his authority regardless, as long as his authority was not used to lead her or her children away from GOD and His laws. The man described here, according to the left, is a mysogynist!

The liberal, Marxist, Maoist, Communist, Socialist, Fascist, leftist, totalitarianist, Democrat, Republican (not all R’s) or whatever, is convinced that this reflects an evil and a hatred for women. If you read the New Testament of the Bible, women are to be revered, deferred to as the weaker sex and to be loved by their husbands as Jesus loved the church which is referred to as His “bride”. This does not sound like hatred, but then we know Satan masquerades as an angel of light, and Satan rules the above listed political ideologies and parties.

Logically, under the rule of Satan, a “feminist” movement was necessary in order to overthrow the Christian order that prevailed in America up until the early 1900’s. Many things happened back then. There was the suffragette movement which primarily pushed for women to have equal rights with voting being the primary focus. (of course, loose morals, smoking and drinking in public, profane language, hard labor etc. all followed)

This writer remembers when William Jefferson Clinton ran for President of America, and he heard first hand women say they were going to vote for him because “he was cute”. Doubtful there’s ever been a cute dictator NOT! Women are different from men. Men do not vote for a political candidate because he is “cute”. Men vote on principles and issues. Feelings are a strong motivator for women, and therefore, the idea of voting for a “cute” candidate.

This sets up a societal, and even a family, conundrum. The man votes for candidate “A” because he is highly principled i.e. Constitutionally and/or Biblically oriented. Meanwhile the woman negates that vote by voting for candidate “B” who is not necessarily as highly, if at all, principled, but he’s “cute”. An example would be Richard Nixon verses John Kennedy. Kennedy being cute, and Nixon being (I gag a bit here) principled. Women tend to emote a lot as well. A woman may be inclined to vote for a candidate who will give money to families to feed their children, because she can identify with that emotional situation. Meanwhile the man might not vote for that candidate, because he knows that stealing from the taxpayer to give to those who did not earn it is not only unprincipled, but it is against the Constitution and Bible.

These are just two examples, but if you study the trend of America, you can see the effeminization of the American male, as well as the political/religious direction it is taking, and you can see a massive decline in principled leadership and masculine behavior. In fact, masculinity is currently under attack as another great evil. It’s time for people to wake up and bring about a restoration of society and the church!

Pensiamento Peligroso