USAID Exec’s plead guilty HERE!

USAID pro-homosexual grants included:

$47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.

$32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Perú.

$2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala.

$6.3 million to study men having sex with men and trannies in South Africa.

$1.5 million to provide support for Jamaican homosexuals.

$70,000 for a “DEI musical” in Ireland.

$47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.

$32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Perú.

$7.9 M to teach Sri Lankan journalists how to avoid “binary-gendered language.”

$1.1 million to an Armenian LGBT group.

$2 M to promote “LGBT equality through entrepreneurship” in Latin America.

$3.9 million for LGBT causes in the Western Balkans.

$5.5 million for LGBTs in Uganda (where homosexual activity is illegal).

Suspension of US aid is ‘catastrophe’ for global LGBTQ rights movement

The above was the Washington Blade’s headline on February 12. Elon Musk’s war on government waste has exposed massive federal pro-LGBT funding. The Blade continued:

“The Trump-Vance administration’s decision to freeze nearly all U.S. foreign aid spending for at least 90 days has had a devastating impact on the global LGBTQ rights movement [since] Washington funds a third of international advocacy.”

All in all, a piece of rather good news for the traditionally minded.

Examples of the catastrophe cited by the Blade included:

Outright International, a global LGBTQ and intersex advocacy group, has paused funding groups in 32 countries in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, and Latin America. “The community-based groups we support with USAID…funding carry out critical human rights, humanitarian and development work,” said Outright International. “This includes protecting community members from violence, providing skills training that allows LGBTIQ people to access employment and entrepreneurial opportunities, and essential services, including healthcare…”

Your tax dollars at work: not to provide the needs of fellow citizens, but for homosexuals in 32 other countries so they can get job training and healthcare.

“The Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights, a Washington-based group that champions LGBTQ and intersex rights in Brazil and elsewhere in Latin America, … lost nearly 80 percent of its funding.”

Brazil, as FRI discovered when approached about testifying there against additional pro-homosexual laws, allows no criticism of LGBTs. Homosexuals and their supporters have changed the law so that people can be sued (and possibly imprisoned) for merely listing the ways homosexuals cost more and contribute less. Even more troubling, a UK woman who posted her ‘disgust’ at homosexual sex acts was ‘forgiven’ of her wrongdoing by UK courts in February. But she was also warned that the tolerance shown could easily be abused — she might be convicted for such public hostility to homosexuals and their activities in the future.

The U.S. taxpayer is supporting a homosexual movement that wants to display the kinds of sex it likes, not only online but in schools and public spaces. LGBTQ proponents want homosexuality to be presented as normal and acceptable; they also want the ability, as in Brazil and the UK, to limit freedom of speech concerning homosexuality. This movement knows that if it can reach youth with its message — ‘just another way to enjoy sex’ — it has a good chance of converting many who would otherwise learn to be heterosexual. Currently, about a third of young women in the U.S. identify as homosexual to some degree. The U.S. is also underwater in producing enough babies. Girls converting to homosexuality is extremely dangerous – after all, without sufficient babies, the future dries up.

Thanks to the U.S. taxpayer, the homosexual movement is sufficiently funded to keep track of homosexual setbacks and advances in just about every political entity across the globe. LBGTs want expansion and control even if their successes threaten mankind’s extinction.

“The LGBTQ+ Victory Institute works with Caribe Afirmativo in Colombia, Promsex in Peru, VoteLGBT in Brazil, and other advocacy groups outside the U.S., has lost around $600,000 — two-thirds of its entire global program budget.”

Equal Namibia and Namibia Pride got $30,000 from USAID. [At least $10,000 has been clawed back] and said “This comes at the worst time as we will need to challenge the new anti-same-sex marriage act passed by the president in October and the upcoming decriminalization case which our Supreme Court will hear soon.” 

FRI was concerned that Trump’s emphasis on eliminating trans accommodations within the government might leave the bulk of the homosexual movement unscathed. But trans is so intertwined with other depravities like cross-dressing and drag shows that all aspects of homosexual expression are getting hammered!

On February 7, Department of Education (DOE) employees were ordered “to end all programs, contracts, policies, outward-facing media, regulations, and internal practices that fail to affirm the reality of biological sex.” They were also told to stop using government property and work time for “employee resource groups that promote gender ideology.” On February 14, the DOE forbade discrimination in “race, color, or national origin” in education. But as the LA Times noted a few days later, discrimination against men and heterosexuals is still allowed since they were not mentioned in the announcement!

Homosexual Nests Behind the Flood of Anti-Straight Grants?

Homosexual nests were discovered in the bureaucracies of pre-Nazi Germany, Nazi Germany, and both the Truman and Eisenhower administrations. Nests begin with hiring a homosexual who acts as a Cuckoo bird, working to replace normals with homosexuals. To do so, he gilds homosexuals’ qualifications and minimizes those of normals. Once surrounded by fellow homosexuals, a nest based on sexual preference has been formed within an ostensibly merit-based system. An Air Force nurse told us: “homosexuals have a society within the Air Force Corps. As they get higher in rank they become more dangerous, giving good assignments and ratings to only their own kind; spouses cannot write one another’s ratings but these lovers do it constantly. [Many] young heterosexual potentials leave to avoid being molested.”

Musk’s efforts to make Washington, D.C. more efficient have exposed the work of these nests. So many of the grants benefit only LGBTs, suggesting that homosexuals authorized them. USAID pro-homosexual grants included:

$47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.

$32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Perú.

$2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala.

$6.3 million to study men having sex with men and trannies in South Africa.

$1.5 million to provide support for Jamaican homosexuals.

$70,000 for a “DEI musical” in Ireland.

$47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.

$32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Perú.

$7.9 M to teach Sri Lankan journalists how to avoid “binary-gendered language.”

$1.1 million to an Armenian LGBT group.

$2 M to promote “LGBT equality through entrepreneurship” in Latin America.

$3.9 million for LGBT causes in the Western Balkans.

$5.5 million for LGBTs in Uganda (where homosexual activity is illegal).

The above grants are so obviously anti-straight, that they constitute prima facie evidence that a homosexual nest comfortable with diverting taxes was involved. Thanks to Musk, we now know that “if a homosexual nest influences funding, it will use some money to expand homosexuality and decrease heterosexuality.” Notice the granularity of what is being funded. Thanks to the internet and constant networking, the homosexual movement now knows when it might seek advantage for homosexuality anywhere on the planet. In poorer countries especially, even if homosexuals are unpopular or despised, these grants help to grow homosexuality.

The Lancet, a major British medical journal, editorialized (2/14) that Trump has limited:

“Federal funding for gender-affirming health care, declaring that there are only two biological sexes, and halting diversity programs — a substantial setback for social justice and equity” but rejoiced that “Taiwan allowed joint adoption for same-sex married couples, and in 2025, Thailand became the latest Asian nation to legalize same-sex marriage.”

How are diversity, social justice, equity, legalizing same-sex marriage, or allowing homosexuals to adopt medical science? The Lancet joins several ostensibly scientific journals and scientific associations currently decrying Trump’s threat to federal funding of homosexuality.

Homosexual Nest Building Before US Supreme Court

A case seemingly involving homosexual nest building is before the US Supreme Court.

No, not a contest as to whether homosexual nests creating a homosexual sub-society threaten greater society, but whether a straight, degreed employee who lost her promotion and then post, was discriminated against by her homosexual supervisor and can seek redress under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Marlean Ames worked since 2004 at Ohio’s Youth Services Department as an executive secretary before seeking a promotion in 2019. Her possible 2019 job went to a lesbian, who unlike Marlean, had no degree. While the lesbian had had management roles, she hadn’t even applied for this position! After losing her bid, Ames’ current post was given to a gay social worker. The homosexual nest was taking shape.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission interprets the 1964 Civil Rights Act to mean that ‘minorities’ are assumed to be discriminated against. This interpretation has resulted in racial and sexual quotas – giving legal advantage to LGBTs over straights, women over men, and Blacks over Whites in any disputes.

When it comes to Ames’ appeal, even though the 1964 act did not mention trans or homosexuality, the Supreme Court broadly interpreted sex to mean sexual orientation or trans in 2020. As the pro-LGBT grants have come to light and resulted in shock and dismay, Supreme Court Judges [and the Editors of the Wall Street Journal] have made comments suggesting Ames might or should win. Hopefully, homosexual nests will be recognized in the SCOTUS decision and employers will be alerted to keep such nests from being built.

President Eisenhower characterized homosexuals in federal employ as “wickedness in government.” Was he wrong if they were instead in State or local governments?

USAID weaponized US money against GOD, family & country HERE!

© March 2025 Paul Cameron, Ph.D. www.familyresearchinst.org POBox 62640, Col Springs, CO 80962