Scroll to the bottom for the sign up link!

The Hope Accord:

The Hope Accord is a significant initiative launched by a coalition of doctors, scientists, and healthcare professionals globally, primarily focused on raising concerns about the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Here’s an explanation:

Objectives of The Hope Accord:

• Immediate Suspension of mRNA Vaccines: The primary demand is for the immediate suspension of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 due to what they describe as a “growing body of evidence” suggesting these vaccines contribute to an “alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.”

• Comprehensive Reevaluation: They call for a thorough reevaluation of these vaccines’ safety, efficacy, and long-term effects. Moreover, this includes advocating for more transparent and rigorous post-marketing surveillance, emphasizing randomized controlled trials to understand the vaccines’ impacts better.

• Support for Vaccine Injured: The Accord seeks recognition and support for those who claim to have been adversely affected by the vaccines, including medical, financial, and social support systems.

• Restoration of Medical Ethics: There’s a strong focus on returning to fundamental ethical principles in medicine, which they argue were compromised during the rollout of these vaccines. Additionally, this includes informed consent, transparency in research, and the right to refuse medical treatments without coercion.

• Addressing Root Causes: The Accord aims to explore and address what they see as systemic issues leading to these concerns, such as institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest, and the suppression of scientific debate.

Public Response and Impact:

• Signatures: The Hope Accord has gained significant traction, with claims of over 50,000 signatures in some reports, including over 1,000 doctors and scientists. It reflects a minority but vocal group within the medical and scientific community.

• Public Discourse: It has sparked considerable debate, especially on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where it has been praised for highlighting potential risks.

Origins and Leadership:

• The initiative was launched on July 3, 2024, with Clare Craig, co-chair of HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team), one of the notable authors. HART is another group that has questioned various aspects of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

• The Accord is supported by figures like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Joseph Fraiman, and others who have been critical of the vaccine rollout and public health measures.

Criticism and Support:

• Criticism: Critics argue that the Accord might exaggerate or misrepresent data, leading to vaccine hesitancy at a time when vaccination remains a key strategy against pandemics. There’s also concern about the peer-reviewed nature of the evidence cited by the Accord.

• Support: Supporters view it as a critical effort to restore medical ethics, ensure patient safety, and address what they perceive as inadequacies in the scientific and regulatory oversight of the vaccines.

In summary:

The Hope Accord represents a contentious yet influential movement within the discourse on COVID-19 vaccines, advocating for reevaluating current practices and policies surrounding mRNA vaccines. Its impact on public health policy remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly contributed to the ongoing debate about vaccine safety, ethics, and public health strategy.

In addition to the Hope Accord:

Various groups of doctors and healthcare professionals have publicly opposed or expressed skepticism regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. Here are some key points based on available information:

• Doctors for COVID Ethics (D4CE): This group, comprising doctors, scientists, and other healthcare professionals, has been vocal about their concerns regarding mRNA vaccines. They published open letters warning about potential adverse effects like cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Signatories include notable figures like Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, a former chair at Johannes Gutenberg University.

• America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS): Founded by Dr. Simone Gold, this group is known for spreading misinformation about the vaccine. They’ve legally challenged the emergency use authorization of the vaccine for children, claiming it’s medically unnecessary and potentially harmful. 

• Individual Physicians: Various doctors have been noted for expressing skepticism about the vaccines. For instance, Dr. Rashid Buttar, and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny have been identified in reports as key figures in disseminating vaccine hesitancy or outright misinformation. 

Several Doctors who oppose the COVID-19 vaccine:

• Dr. Peter McCullough: He has been vocal against widespread vaccination and has published several articles, although most are not directly anti-vaccine but rather discuss treatment protocols for COVID-19. He’s cited in discussions around vaccine safety and has appeared in various publications questioning the broad application of vaccines. However, his most cited works concern early treatment rather than vaccine opposition.

• Dr. Robert Malone: Known for his contributions to mRNA technology, Malone has expressed significant skepticism about the mRNA vaccines. While he has numerous peer-reviewed publications, his direct opposition to the vaccine’s safety or rollout is often found in interviews, social media, and op-eds rather than in peer-reviewed literature.

• Dr. David Martin has been noted for discussing the legal and ethical implications of the vaccine rollout rather than scientific research against vaccines. His background is in finance, business, and patent analysis.

• Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: While she has been very vocal against vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccine, her published work does not prominently feature in peer-reviewed journals opposing the vaccine; her opposition is more public-facing through speeches and media appearances.

Some doctors’ narratives of vaccine opposition often intersect with broader debates on medical freedom, government overreach, and the ethics of vaccine mandates. Most doctors believe the COVID-19 vaccine to be safe and effective, but this does not necessarily prove the minority doctors wrong.    

For more information and support of the minority opposition to the COVID-19 vaccines:

“The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity,” and “Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and the War Against the Human” by Naomi Wolf, special advisor for Bill Clinton. In addition, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health” by RFK Jr.

The Hope Accord website, found at: thehopeaccord.org

Pensiamento Peligroso