Egalitarianism, Homosexuality, and Therapy-ism PromotingDeath?

Thanks to Family Research Institute:

Egalitarianism, Homosexuality, and Therapy-ism Promoting Death?

Successful societies must persuade (or induce) women to have children. Children’s additional benefit is that parenthood is one of the most powerful influences turning ’what’s in it for me’ adolescents into concerned citizens (e.g., parents view the world with their children in mind).

The US has been the most successful large country for over a hundred years. Derived from the obviously false assertion that “all men are created equal,” every citizen has a vote, and a wide range of opinions are tolerated under freedom of speech. Most nations attempt to emulate the US and its notion of ‘freedom of speech,’ so increasingly women are exposed to and participate in philosophies/arguments whose thrust is to divert them from motherhood.

A handful of influences will fail to completely account for women’s increasing disinterest in motherhood. However, as women account for 60-75% of the hours spent in ‘mental therapy’ as well as hours spent attending religious meetings, both are included as ‘choice-based’ v ‘duty-based’ thinking about parenthood. The growth of homosexuality (increasingly affecting young females) is generating nests within government and businesses to expand homosexuality, protect LGBTs, and subvert entertainment to promote anti-natalist messages.

Mental health counselors are client-indulgent, and choice-oriented about motherhood (thus pro-homosexual, pro-contraception, and pro-abortion — should a ‘god’ be allowed to limit a woman’s freedom in a society where ‘the consumer is always right?’). AI says that non-religious women more frequently attend therapy sessions and that those who attend them are less apt to become mothers and have fewer children when they do. Non-religious families and mothers who attend therapy: produce children who become parents less frequently (and have fewer if they do); utilize therapy; are more apt to become substance abusers or LGBT; enjoy less employment stability; and are more likely to engage in criminality. These outcomes are correlations and due to factors other than utilizing therapy.

Clergy are duty-oriented about motherhood as God’s first command was “reproduce.” They lean against homosexuality, contraception, and abortion. Women who attend religious meetings are more apt to have children and have more if they do. Their children are more apt to have children (and have more children if they do) and are less apt to: utilize therapy; become substance abusers or LGBT; have employment instability; and engage in criminality. These are correlations and may be due to factors other than religious involvement.

Recently, birth control and abortion pills have been made available in complete secrecy. So, every woman must decide whether to try for a child and then also decide whether she will keep her pregnancy. Current reality thus heavily promotes the homosexual/therapists’ side.

Employment leading to more material wealth and status has lured ever more women from motherhood. Employed young women (18-25) are more apt to be non-religious (60-70% employed v 40-50% of the religious). Therapy-users are more likely to be employed (60-70% of users v 40-50% of non-users). Thus, religion is associated with decreasing, while therapy is associated with increasing female employment.

Although correlations do not prove causation, the findings in Table 1 are consonant with causation. Table 1 summarizes the various % generated by GPT-4-O mini for having attended mental health therapy and ‘attended religious meetings at least 2X per month.’ Also included in Table 1 is whether the subjects were LGBT, whether they were employed, and the Total Fertility Rate [TFR] of their country/continent. Table 1’s first line says that the US has a fertility rate of

Table 1: TFR & 18-25 yr olds homosexuality, use of therapy, religious attendance, & employment.

Entity TFR	LGBT%/v Hetero %	talk therapy	relig 2X+/ mo.	employed
US 1.78	Male LGBT ~10%	35-45%	5-15%	70-80%
	Female LGBT ~14%	45-55%	10-20	65-75
	M Hetero 90%	15-25%	40-60	80-90
	F Hetero 86%	20-30%	30-50	75-85
UK 1.60	Male LGBT 9%	40-50	5-12	75-85
	Female LGBT 17%	50-60	12-18	70-80
	Male Het 91%	15-25	40-60	85-90
	Female Het 89%	25-35	35-55	75-85
EU 1.53	Male LGBT 13%	40-50	5-10	75-85
	Female LGBT 17%	50-60	8-15	70-80
	Male Het 87%	15-25	30-50	80-90
	Female Het 83%	25-35	25-45	75-85
Afghanistan 4.02	M/F LGBT 2%/1%
Pakistan 3.58	M/F LGBT 1%/3%
Japan 1.34	M/F LGBT 6%/8%
China 1.30	M/F LGBT 9%/11%
India 2.0	M/F LGBT 8%/10%
So Korea 0.81	M/F LGBT 5%/7%
Africa 4.4	M/F LGBT 5%/6%

1.78 per woman; 10% of young men are LGBT; 35-45% of LGBT men have attended therapy; 5-15% have attended religious meetings 2X or more per month; and 70-80% of these LGBTs are employed. All AI estimates are ranges rather than point estimates due in part to changes in sexual taste or activity among those claiming or engaging in homosexuality or heterosexuality.

For adults aged 18-25, almost without exception, the % of homosexuals of both sexes (and women more than men) for the US, UK, EU, as well as Japan, China, South Korea, India, & Africa [not shown] were more apt to attend talk therapy, in line with the pre-1973 psychiatric view that homosexuality was a — or associated with — mental illness and the general psychiatric finding that women are less psychologically robust than men. For both sexes, LGBTs attended therapy more frequently than they attended religious services 2X/month & were less apt to hold a job than heterosexuals; heterosexuals of both sexes were more apt to have attended religious services than their LGBT counterparts and did so more frequently than they attended talk therapy. The AI said young women who attend talk therapy tend to be mothers less frequently than those who do not, while young women who attend religious meetings 2X or more per month tend to be mothers more frequently than those who do not. Young women who vote Democrat approximate a TFR of 1.5-2.0 while those who vote Republican have one of 2.0-2.5.

Humans are born without a manual and we often spend considerable time trying to find it or create it. The findings in Table 1 generally fit the model that: 1) homosexuals seek to grow and control society whilst molesting its children 2) therapy-ism seeks to provide its professionals a good living, supports a kind of egalitarianism that accepts homosexuality, abortion, contraception and childlessness so that clients are provided support and intellectual justification for almost any fancy (but therapy-ism has over 500 different models, none of which stands out as working much better at ending substance abuse, depression, anxiety, etc.); 3) the religious are pro-natal and attempt to suppress homosexuality, contraception, abortion, and childlessness ; 4) the US economy, a mixture of capitalism & socialism, longs to get the best males and females as workers and shed the rest — giving no thought to demographic decline or the males who will become near-useless by taking so many women out of the household and child rearing into careers and leadership (when therapy-based tests have women more mentally fragile).

There are glaring exceptions to the above model. Afghanistan and Pakistan – where “boys are for pleasure, women are for children” — holds sway, with TFRs of 4,02 and 3.58. The AI estimated that 10-20% of boys in Afghanistan and 1-3% of boys in Pakistan are victims of homosexual ‘boy play.’ Homosexuality, the Muslim religion, and tribalism [a fifth influence] have compromised in that no matter how homosexual a male’s desires, or how disinterested in sex with his wife, he must marry and have children. Even though the Taliban came to power with the promise of eliminating the systematic rape of little boys [e.g., “Such is the Pashtun obsession with sodomy—locals tell you that birds fly over Kandahar using only one wing, the other covering their posterior—that the rape of young boys by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban. In the summer of 1994 … two commanders confronted each other over a young boy whom they both wanted to sodomite. In the ensuing fight civilians were killed. Omar’s group freed the boy and appeals began flooding in for Omar to help in other disputes. By November, Omar and his Taliban were Kandahar’s new rulers”¹ The AI says boy play continues. The situation in Pakistan is similar (e.g. not only has the Punjab Minister for Law and Parliamentary Affairs, said the “majority of children admitted to Madrassas to get religious education were abused,”² but government officials have told me that they cannot stop it).

Pakistan has the hydrogen bomb and many of the accouterments of modernity within a largely tribal society, while Afghanistan has a similar but poorer tribal society. While both pay lip service to egalitarianism, women are regarded as inferior, and motherhood is almost the only way for them to attain status. No matter our denunciation of their almost total hospitalization leading to so many rapes of boys, their TFRs indicate they will endure while the West will not.

It is not clear how homosexuality came to dominate these countries, but therapy-ism supports hospitalization; the LGBTs are busily creating their nests within governments, schools, and entertainment to accelerate it; and LGBTs accounted for about half the child molestations in our assemblage of all Google News US child molestation stories from 2012-2021; the leaders of the US economic engine want to employ more women no matter the demographic consequences; and the religious comprise the only sizable influence in US society opposing homosexuality and pushing motherhood (the US had a TFR of over 2.5 and attained its highest church attendance after President Eisenhower’s crackdown against “homosexual wickedness”). There are foreign threats, but our expanding rights to choose (e.g., contraception, sex partners, abortion, childlessness), coupled with ever lessening emphasis upon the duty of those we raised to marry and have children, means we risk — as Eisenhower warned — failure “from within.”

Refs: 1. Reid T. The gay capital of South Asia. The Times of London 2002, 12 January. 2. International News 2009, 20 November.