Please NOTE:

Updates in first paragraph are in sequential order so the most recent is at the end:

What’s Next? (90 Day Forecast! Food for thought – Are the L.A. fires and record winds a result of Geo-engineering? Is this the result of arson? Was the water shortage inflicted by design? Is the resulting Marshall law (curfew) part of a long term plan? As of this writing, 10,000 + structures are believed lost. That would conservatively equal $20 billion! When this is all over, it will be at least $40 billion. The BBC estimates as high as $135 billion! The New York Post is estimating $150 billion! My estimate does not include the loss of personal property (i.e. cars, art, furniture, clothing, appliances, etc.). It does not include labor and materials used for fighting the fire all of which will be additional billions. It also does not include the city of Los Angeles’s loss of property tax revenues; likely to exceed $20 billion as well! Barron’s magazine perspective HERE! Zero Hedge perspective HERE! Insurance companies cancel fire policies right before fires HERE! Democrats at fault HERE! FOX interview with James Woods HERE! L.A.’s Mayor Bass HERE! More on Bassole and Governor Gruscum HERE! Intentional destruction to create 15 minute cities HERE & HERE! He who smelt it dealt it HERE! Is L.A. A Communist Take Over HERE? Tucker interviews Michael Schellenberger HERE! Joe Biden knocks himself out on behalf of Californians NOT HERE! Democrats more concerned with “Trump proofing” California than helping Californians HERE! U.S. Military “Fire as a weapon” HERE! FOX’s Jesse Waters evaluated looting, arson and crime HERE! Mel Gibson (whose home was destroyed) HERE! Treasonous Governor Gruscum HERE! Milk and beer from the refrigerator saved two homes when water was not available HERE – were meters a contributing factor to the fires?!

Here’s some history – more comments below this article:

The Politicization of Wind and Fire

Decades of Santa Ana winds fueling fires show California’s failure to prioritize land management, instead focusing on politics while residents face predictable disasters.

By Edward Ring Amer Greatness

January 15, 2025

The first time I’d ever heard of the Santa Ana wind was while reading an essay famed author Joan Didion wrote, “Los Angeles Notebook,” which is included in her book Slouching Towards Bethlehem. Writing in 1968, Didion describes what had happened just a decade earlier.

The longest single Santa Ana period in recent years was in 1957,” Didion writes, “and it lasted not the usual three or four days but fourteen days, from November 21 until December 4. On the first day, 25,000 acres of the San Gabriel Mountains were burning, with gusts reaching 100 miles per hour. In town, the wind reached Force 12, or hurricane force, on the Beaufort Scale… On November 30 the San Gabriel fire was still out of control, and the wind in town was blowing eighty miles an hour.

This conflagration, nearly 70 years ago, involved a weather event that was easily a match for what Angelenos are enduring today. That hasn’t stopped the climate crisis industry from pouncing on this tragedy to score political points. From the Sierra Club on January 8, “Time and again, we are witnessing climate change heighten extreme weather, making wildfires increasingly common and increasingly destructive.” From the BBC, “Climate ‘whiplash’ linked to raging LA fires.”

We will hear more of this agenda-driven, politically motivated hectoring, even though according to at least some climate experts, including John Christy, professor of Atmospheric Science at the University of Alabama and originally a California native, over a century of climate data in California refutes the climate crisis narrative.

But what if the climate crisis narrative is valid? So what? If our climate is turning against us, doesn’t that mean we have to be even more prepared to cope with what nature’s going to throw at us, starting with the Santa Ana winds?

Rather than look in the mirror, environmentalists claim these fires are being exploited for political gain by their critics. For example, Steve Lopez, a regular columnist for the Los Angeles Times, accuses president-elect Trump of “using the fires as a political piñata.” But it’s the people running California, the Democrats that Trump and other critics are now holding accountable, who have politicized the management of everything. Not just land use and climate science, but entire industries and every category of infrastructure. Nothing has escaped their reach.

After California’s devastating fires in the summer of 2020, Newsom issued an executive order to ban the sale of gasoline-powered cars starting in 2035. After another round of fires in 2023, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against five major oil companies, accusing them of knowingly misleading the public regarding the harm that fossil fuels would inflict on the climate.

This is pure political theater. What California’s forests need, along with the chaparral currently being immolated in the Santa Monica and San Gabriel mountains surrounding the Los Angeles Basin, is responsible land management. Before having any discussion, even of firefighting response, much less the “climate crisis,” California’s governor, supported by the state legislature, needs to enact sweeping reforms that, among other things, radically deregulate the activities of timber harvesting, mechanical thinning, grazing, and controlled burns.

As it is, the canyons between the neighborhoods on the hills and ridges surrounding Los Angeles are dangerously overgrown, along with the adjacent state parks and open space. There’s no way to completely stop a wildfire when the Santa Ana winds turn Los Angeles County into a blast furnace. But if the state and county had managed their open space, and private property owners had been not merely permitted but required to clear overgrown brush around their homes, these fires would not have had enough fuel to become the catastrophes we’re witnessing today.

When it comes to politics, exposing DEI-driven incompetence is also touted by defenders of the bureaucracy as another example of how this conflagration is being politicized by its critics. But there is nothing about DEI that is not political, so critics are politicizing something that is already explicitly political. To put this as delicately as possible, thanks to DEI, the chief of the Los Angeles Fire Department, the assistant chief of the Los Angeles Fire Department, the Los Angeles Fire Department’s first “Equity Bureau Chief,” and the CEO of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power are all political appointees who check two diversity boxes.

It is also worth noting that Allstate, State Farm, Farmers and other insurance companies have pulled out or reduced coverage options in California recently HERE! If so, will the government become the insurer of last resort? That would be very expensive and inefficient and unjust! Biden and the feds are calling for “full coverage” for the next 180 days! What about the people who suffered hurricane damage in the Carolinas and Tennessee who have never been compensated properly, if at all? What about the Maui fire damages – same thing? How much money do the Feds have to give away and insure losses – we are already bankrupt! See below!

Is America Bankrupt? Look At The Official Numbers & You Decide

Pensiamento Peligroso